Sex for sale: could it be safer?
by W. Eric Martin
Supporters and opponents of prostitution both agree on one point: the world's
oldest profession should be decriminalized. So why hasn't it happened?
Cities' efforts to eliminate prostitution generally take one approach: after
enduring searches and ridicule from the police, prostitutes pay a fine and
return to work the same evening. To pay the fine, they serve more customers,
increasing their risk of being assaulted or arrested again. The police stay busy
and city leaders trumpet arrest totals傭ut nothing permanent has been
accomplished.
Prostitutes would love to avoid this legal treadmill, but efforts to gain
support for their rights as sex workers through groups like the National Task
Force on Prostitution and COYOTE (Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics) have gone
nowhere. They've even talked of unionizing, but their first goal remains
repealing laws against solicitation.
Although many people sympathize with prostitutes, response from the politicians
who have the power to change these laws has been minimal. The best chance for
change came in 1996, when the San Francisco Task Force on Prostitution issued a
report calling for city departments to stop prosecuting prostitution crimes.
Two-thirds of the public who responded to a newspaper survey supported this
conclusion, but so far nothing has changed in that city.
What options exist?
Few favor legalization of prostitution, in which the government authorizes
the right of prostitutes to work. In brothels in Nevada, for example, a
prostitute must service any clients who choose her, can only walk around town
during specific hours and can't have non-paying visitors during her three-week
work period.
"Legalization would 'normalize' what in my opinion is rape, battery and human
rights violations," says Melissa Farley, Ph.D., a research and clinical
psychologist and director of Prostitution Research and Education, a project of
the San Francisco Women's Centers. "It makes no sense to turn the state into a
pimp in order to collect taxes." Prostitutes' rights groups also reject
legalization as they would merely be trading ostracism and persecution for
unreasonable restrictions on how they live.
Decriminalization is more straightforward様aws criminalizing the sale of sexual
services between consenting adults would be eliminated. Laws currently
prohibiting sex with minors, assault, extortion and rape would provide
prostitutes with a legal recourse they can't currently access due to their
outlaw status. Right now, says Rachel West, spokeswoman for the US PROStitutes
Collective, "Violent men know they can get away with their crimes because the
women are criminalized."
Would decriminalization work?
"Laws against prostitution aren't effective; they only hurt the people who
work as prostitutes," says Norma Jean Almodovar, president and founder of
ISWFACE (International Sex Worker Foundation for Art, Culture and
Education用ronounced "ice face") and author of Cop to Call Girl. This belief,
held by both supporters and opponents of prostitution, makes decriminalization
the best solution to the problems facing prostitutes, such as sexual violence,
extortion by the police and criminal records that affect subsequent employment
opportunities.
Rachel West believes that decriminalization would give prostitutes more control
over their income and working conditions. Instead of the current
pimp/madam-dominated system or a Nevada-style legalization in which the brothel
managers and owners control the women, prostitutes would have more choices about
how and where they work, what they charge, who they do business with and a
hundred other questions that face legitimate businesses.
A better use of public funds?
In addition to encouraging economic self-determination, decriminalization
would loosen up funds for legal protection and social services for prostitutes.
"What happens in most cities is that their law enforcement resources go into a
criminalization process: arrests, court time, decoy operations, police
stakeouts, and street sweeps," says Lori Nairne, who works with Legal Action for
Women. "But the poverty, the welfare cuts, the lack of child care services葉he
reasons why the majority of women go into prostitution葉hose problems don't get
addressed."
Nairne, who served with West on the San Francisco Task Force on Prostitution,
says that the city spends $7 million per year arresting and prosecuting women
money that could go towards housing, food, clothing, and child care that might
keep women from entering prostitution in the first place.
Opponents of prostitution would embrace this redirection of funds, but they
reject the rosy image of prostitutes hanging out their shingles and filing for
franchises. "Prostitution will not become an accepted practice," says Evelina
Giobbe, executive director of the Commercial Sexual Exploitation Research
Institute in Minnesota. "Women will still have pimps and still get AIDS;
children will still be involved."
Turning the tables
Melissa Farley agrees with Giobbe. "Decriminalization would mean that access
of customers and pimps to run and control women in prostitution would be
completely opened up. It would expand and increase prostitution a good deal." To
combat this, Farley recommends adopting the principles of a new Swedish law
aimed at reducing the spread of the commercial sex industry. "I'd love to see no
criminalization of the victim in prostitution and have the sexual exploiters in
prostitution葉he pimp and the john様abeled and prosecuted as criminals," she
says.
Farley argues for this approach because she can't imagine decriminalization
changing the balance of power between privileged, moneyed men and poor women and
children. "When women have no money and a customer offers three times as much to
not use a condom, the women don't use condoms," says Farley.
Change takes time
You're not likely to hear the next crop of presidential candidates
championing the cause of prostitutes, but local politicians tend to be more open
to change. And Lori Nairne stresses that regardless of national and state law,
cities can choose not to enforce particular laws if they believe the money would
be better spent elsewhere.
Much of the delay in decriminalization, however, is an issue of perceived
morality. People feel that sex for hire is somehow inherently bad or wrong, even
among consenting adults.
"The problem boils down to changing the way people think about the act," says
Almodovar of ISWFACE. "Unfortunately, what would happen if we eliminated
solicitation laws today would be similar to what's happened with abortion. The
morality (issue) that makes abortion unacceptable to some people has not changed
and that's why the freedom to have an abortion is slowly being eroded."
Like Almodovar, Melissa Farley sees herself working for this goal in the
long-term. "People didn't imagine that slavery would ever end in the U.S.," says
Farley. "Slavery looked nice for some people, and I would say the same thing
about prostitution. But the institution itself is a crime against women."